The Complete Document
City of London - The British Elite and their Agenda for
World Domination - Below report
Manipulation - Controlling the Minds of the
Population to Change their Behavior
World Health Organization - The WHO has been
set up to operate as a one world government
Conclusion - Private entities are taking
over the world
THE CITY OF
LONDON - FIRST SUMMARY
The expert witnesses during session 2 of the Grand Jury are a former
officer of the British Intelligence Services (partner agency to the
US National Security Agency -
NSA), and a Canadian investigative
They explain the long history of the aim for world
dominance by the British elite.
The British Empire still exists, and
the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India,
19 African Countries, and the Caribbean,
...while they extend their
hand into virtually every other nation of the world.
headquarters are in the
City of London, an area of one square mile,
which is the financial center of the world. The City of London isn't
governed by the British government but on the contrary reigns
supreme over it.
The City of London has its own courts and police
and has never been challenged in its sovereignty and
self-government. It rules over the Crown and over most of the Earth.
The British elite believe they have the right to enslave the rest of
humanity, which they consider to be their 'livestock'.
views they own the population - body, mind and soul. Democracy is
only an illusion to keep the people at peace, while the City of
London calls the shots and pulls the strings.
This elite made several attempts at so-called ‘New
which all failed.
They almost succeeded in reigning in the United
States but failed there as well.
Now they use the
to further their goal of world domination, using psychological
techniques to get the world population to blindly obey their every
command, under the guise of 'keeping everybody safe'.
Mind control has for a long time been at the heart of their
After three industrial revolutions, a fourth industrial
revolution is now emerging that focuses on owning the minds of the
The deeper purpose of the vaccination programs is to edit the genome
of humanity, and thus create a new
transhuman race that will behave
according to the desires of the oligarchs.
This has always been the
ultimate desire of tyrants in the past, but only now does technology
allow the re-creation of humanity to become the perfect slaves.
Our world is threatened by a rebirth of the ancient system of
slavery, which has been technologically upgraded to install a whole
new level of all encompassing slavery over the entire world
- ALEX THOMSON
Alex Thomson is a former officer of Britain's Signal Intelligence
GCHQ, the partner agency to
NSA (National Security Agency -
He was desk officer for
the former Soviet Union and a transcriber of intercepted material.
Thomson was part of GCHQ's cross disciplinary team for chemical,
biological, radiological and nuclear threats, CBRN.
As an intelligence officer Alex learned about the British strategy
for world domination. He explains the historic background and the
current power structure of the British Empire, and how the COVID-19
'pandemic' plays a key role in their agenda.
The following is a summary of the most important information
revealed by Alex Thomson.
To get all the details, please watch the full session here:
The City of London is the financial heart of the British Empire and
the dominant power in the world.
It readied itself for that
situation from roughly 1870. The modern world, the monopolization,
the cartelization of the world, begins at that time.
we do in investigating the corruption emanating from British Crown
monopolies and City of London money does seem to point back to this
period from around 1870, in which there were several revolutions by
the British elite.
These revolutions all revolved around containing productivity and
preventing a growth of intelligence and intellectual property among
the native peoples of the British Empire and in competitor nations.
There was a revolution in what you might call mind space, which
since 2010 has been an explicit term used by the British
government's central department, the Cabinet Office.
A revolution in
the quality of education offered to British and other
A revolution in
the theft of intellectual property by the elite.
A revolution in
the model of healthcare and free access to it.
At home, a
constitutional revolution from the classic British Liberal
This all happened since
1870, and in Britain it was largely complete by the crucial year
1947-1948 when Britain had a unique situation of a National Health
Service and was pushing the way towards the military unification of
the European continent and the whole of NATO.
Britain was leading the
in reinventing how it managed its population.
The center node is the City of London,
the square mile at the very
of what is now called Greater London.
City of London:
Has a legal
status apart from the 32 other London boroughs.
were entrenched as early as Magna Carta 1215.
self-government has never been challenged.
It has, at many
times in its history, had power over
the British Crown and
hence over a large slice of the Earth during the British
The City of London has
control over the Westminster Parliament, notably in the form of an
official of the City of London known as the Remembrancer, who sits
in the House of Commons where not even the monarch is allowed to
enter, and records what is being said against financial interests.
The Cabinet Office is a department which was set up in the early
20th century, as the repository of Crown prerogatives.
1870, the constitutional revolution has ensured that financiers
controlling political parties actually pull believers of Crown
Behind the scenes, the model of government Britain
still is that of an inner sanctum, the Privy Council, which actually
governs in the name of The Crown.
It is only for show
and government departments
MINDS OF HUMANITY
The history academic at Georgetown University, Carroll Quigley,
former tutor of
Bill Clinton, wrote in his book,
Tragedy & Hope - A History of the World in Our Time, that there have been
Yes, that familiar language coming from the
World Economic Forum was being written about in the 1960s already by
The perspective which is being assumed here is that of who
owns the population, first in Britain and then in the British
the ownership of land, of agricultural means provides wealth
revolution: mechanical - industrial
in which financial capital dominates the world
It's from this period
around 1870 onwards that the smart money in the City of London
realizes that even that bubble is going to burst.
The most efficient way
own the world in the future,
will be to own the minds.
That is the
fourth industrial revolution...
Both the British and the German elite were determined to achieve
world domination, both industrially and in the mind space.
The City of London's trading model emphasized the importance of
controlling, not just military force or physical assets anymore, but
the minds of people now known as human resources.
This is why science fiction starts speaking about ownership of man's
genetic makeup from this time.
The City of London and Britain's very wealthy soft power
institutions continue to regard that battle for the mind as their
top priority for world domination, and they regard health as a
subsector of that battle.
The British elite regard themselves still
as the world's leading power in mind space...
The strategy taught in
boarding schools, universities or officer training of intelligence
agencies is very much the credo of the leading bloodlines of elite
families that run the City of London.
And it is the modus operandi
of the Anglo-American tax exempt foundations and of the think-tanks
Chatham House, above all, which push the agendas of those
bloodlines upon the Western governments.
FOCUS ON WORLD
A key figure from the year 1870 is that of John Ruskin, seemingly an
innocuous figure because he was the first professor of art at
Oxford, but he brought the doctrine that the British elite really
had a duty to export its own world view to the rest of the world.
And his key student whom he inspired
was Cecil Rhodes, who became
fabulously wealthy in Southern Africa.
Cecil Rhodes wrote secret
diaries and formed secret societies.
In 1891, after 16 years of
planning, his main secret society was formed - the Rhodes
Scholarships are part of that society.
Oxford members of the Rhodes
network were the likes of Lord Toynbee and Lord Milner, well-known
In Cambridge there was the future Foreign
Secretary, Lord Grey and Lord Esher.
In London there was the leading
journalist at the time, W.T. Stead, and initiates and members of the
Executive Committee of Cecil Rhodes were the above-named men, plus
After Rhodes' death in 1902, other leading English
bloodlines that repeatedly plagued the City of London history, such
the Astors, came into the same circle.
The outer circle became
known as the
Round Table Group, still functioning in the United
States and seven other countries, set up from 1909 onwards.
group regarded the success of the Canadian Federation, 1867, as its
leading case study. Canada was effectively politically unified.
In order to prevent
being a spread of different views,
democracies in the world,
they must instead all be traced back
to the City of London's
This is very contemporary too because among the many Rhodes scholars
that dominate world politics and push the world towards globalism
are Bill Clinton and, from the World Economic Forum, the New Zealand
Lady Professor Ngaire Woods, who this year became very well known
for her saying at the WEF that,
the elite can do beautiful things if
they come together and if the people of the world simply accept that
they are in the lead.
This vision did not remain the ravings of a
particularly wealthy Englishman, but they nativized themselves in
the United States in the so-called Eastern Establishment, the
Eastern Seaboard, as the United States became the world's dominant
The key testimony on this is that of
Norman Dodd, given
shortly before his death in 1982 to G. Edward Griffin, easily found
online as Norman Dodd on the tax-exempt foundations.
Dodd was the
key staffer for Reese, the congressman from East Tennessee, who in
the 1950s on behalf of Congress carried out an investigation into
the effect of these tax-exempt foundations in the United States.
implemented the City of London's
and Cecil Rhodes'
for world domination.
It is not enough to be by far the world's greatest military and
If your mind space is still controlled by the
unexamined assumption that everyone at the top is paid up to
liberty, then a club with self-interest is still going to run the
And even in areas such as healthcare, which Britain first socialized
in 1948, you're going to find that people
wrongly and blithely assume that their best interests are kept at
The offshoot of the City of London in Manhattan in Wall Street
funded both sides of both world wars. Serious academics such as
Anthony Sutton, who was at the Hoover Institute at Stanford
University in California, have written whole books about this
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and
and the Rise of Hitler.
There was a whole trail of documents which
was recovered by Anthony Sutton. It cost him his tenure at Stanford.
What he found was that both the Soviet Union and the Third Reich
were brought into being for the interests of the City of London and
more particularly, its Wall Street end.
Just one example of the total reach of British intelligence in areas
which is not constitutionally able or permitted to have, is that
MI5, even before the Second World War, was vetting who got onto the
airwaves of the BBC, who got promoted and who got transferred.
was set up by the bloodlines to further their private aims.
The British Cabinet Office
is openly speaking about
its control of
the world's thinking
and the thinking of the British people.
They're labeling parts of
the brain under the label of
Their document says:
"Even if people agree
with the behavior goal, they may object to the means of
The different MINDSPACE
effects will attract different levels of controversy. There are
several factors that determine controversy."
"The goal is therefore to make sure that citizens don't fully
realize that their behavior is being changed, or at least how it
is being changed."
"Clearly, this opens government up to charges of manipulation.
People have a strong dislike of being tricked. This dislike has
a psychological grounding, but fundamentally it is an issue of
trust in government. A lack of conscious control also has
implications for consent and freedom of choice.
creates a greater need for citizens to approve the use of the
behavior change, perhaps using new forms of Democratic
In this model,
democracy is the highest good that's sold,
levers of manipulating democracy
are in the hands of the cartel.
Reiner Fuellmich: Is
it correct that the City of London is the real powerhouse in the
Alex Thomson: Without any doubt.
This is something that if
you've had my background, you learn at boarding school, let
alone at university.
And by the time you get into the civil
service, there is a lot of eyerolling if you ever suggest that
the people of Britain, or any other country in the Commonwealth,
The City of London
the population, body, mind and soul.
Reiner Fuellmich: Ultimately, it's the control of the people's
mind that the City of London really wanted, to further their
goal of world domination. Is that correct?
Alex Thomson: Yes.
Reiner Fuellmich: So ultimately what we're seeing is a very
powerful institution - City of London - which bridges the
Atlantic because as its fifth column they have
Those two powers united are the center of power in this world.
Alex Thomson: There are struggles.
For a long time there was the
completely nontrivial Cold War, with branches of the aristocracy
in the City of London being both pro- and anti-Soviet Union. I
could talk for hours just about that.
But that is secondary to
the determination that there must be only a German block and a
Russian block in Eurasia, and that both of these ultimately must
be controlled and hemmed in by British or Anglo-American sea
power and Anglo-American soft power setting the paradigms for
Reiner Fuellmich: Another thing that I wanted to clarify is, you
mentioned that it is just a few families who really run the City
You mentioned the names of
Is it true that it's just a few families who are trying
to dominate the world through the City of London?
Alex Thomson: Yes.
I have never found better material than that
of a writing duo which is Dutch/ German-American.
is Robin de Ruiter.
His American German co-author is
Fritz Springmeier from South Carolina.
They have the rather shocking
Bloodlines of the Illuminati.
But their work is
They consistently show
that the City of London,
Manhattan, the European continent,
are very much dominated
small number of families.
Often 13 is given as the top level of these families.
there are levels below that. The French, for example, often
spoke about "les 200 familles," the 200 bloodlines, that run the
But the senior ones terrorize the junior ones, and
the highest you can get up before you disappear into nebulous
claims of Satan running the world, which ultimately, I believe
But the highest level you can get up to is a level at which
Central European Germanic bloodlines have an uneasy truce with
British Isles bloodlines, most of whom are now based in the
Reiner Fuellmich: And one of the major means through which these
very few families are trying to dominate the rest of the world,
seems to be through mind space, which sounds like mind control.
Does that mean through psychological operations?
Alex Thomson: Very much so.
No nation got into the game of
psychological operations earlier than Britain. As soon as there
were formal intelligence agencies in Britain in the Edwardian
era, just before the First World War, it was a major
But they borrowed a lot of their insights from
Vienna and from Germany, which were leading in the psychological
space at the time.
This is a
transnational interest in both
and the Germanic areas
of world domination at the time,
the tricks of mind space.
And these were largely perfected when America had unchallenged
Germany after 1945, using a lot of the Third Reich and Soviet
minds who were actually brought over to the United States
Mind control has
been regarded - since the days of Edward Bernays and Freud - as
the most powerful way of controlling action in the real world.
If you have that power, you control people who are more
numerous, more intelligent and stronger than yourself.
Reiner Fuellmich: Did
I hear correctly that you used the term livestock? Is that
really the view that these people have of the rest of the world?
Alex Thomson: It is explicitly the view that, certainly in the
1990s when I was at a senior British boarding school, this term
was used by the grandsons of City of London seniors.
the word 'livestock' to describe the British population.
They are considered
and do not deserve a place in the world
other than under the direction of the British elite.
Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt: So, you will agree that financial
dominance is at the core of the Covid-19 'pandemic'?
Alex Thomson: Yes, I would, and I would qualify it very slightly
by reminding you that in Carroll Quigley's summary of the
Anglo-American elite establishment's worldview, he points out
that the ownership of financial assets is already outdated by
And he knows that the
great brains, not necessarily
the good brains, a century prior to him already saw this coming.
They regard the real
as human minds and health
and the ability to
alter and copyright, in time,
the human being
into a new model
that would behave as expected.
Ana Garner: You mention copyrighting the human mind,
copyrighting even the genetics.
Do you feel that there is a link
current so-called vaccines - the shots from Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen, AstraZeneca - and this goal of copyrighting
Alex Thomson: I very strongly believe that.
I'm not medically or
biotechnologically qualified to explain how much truth there may
be in this, but I've seen time and again that where there is
hype and where there is a pseudo theological belief among the
elite in Britain and America that you can achieve a certain aim
by pulling a certain trick such as,
by editing a gene and
stamping a copyright on the human body, that is enough
motivation in and of itself to fuel a serious attempt to go that
The very heart of it
is the idea that genetic editing
will allow the copyrighting of
of souls and bodies in humanity
that are affected, so that
they're no longer
under the Creator.
- MATTHEW EHRET
Matthew J.L. Ehret is a journalist, lecturer and founder of the
Canadian Patriot Review and the Rising Tide Foundation.
He is an author with Strategic Culture, The Duran, Fort Russ, LA
Review of Books - China Channel, and has also been published on Asia
Times, Global Times, Oriental Review, SOTT and Zero Hedge.
He has authored three volumes of the book series "Untold History of
The following is a summary of the most important information
revealed by Matthew Ehret.
The British Hand Behind the Global Deep State
To get all the details, please watch the full session here:
I will first deal with
the present situation, just to get across what is the British hand
in global affairs today.
The first thing is a
video of about a minute and a half.
"I, Justin PJ.
Trudeau, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true
allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada,
her heirs and successors, so help me God."
"I, Justin PJ. Trudeau, do solemnly and sincerely swear that I
shall be a true and faithful servant to Her Majesty Queen
Elizabeth II, as a member of Her Majesty's Privy Council for
I will in all things
to be treated, debated and resolved in Privy Council,
faithfully, honestly and truly declare my mind and my opinion.
I shall keep secret
all matters committed and revealed to me in this capacity, or
that she'll be secretly treated of in council.
Generally, in all
things I shall do as a faithful and true servant ought to do for
Her Majesty, so help me God."
That is confusing for
some people who saw this in 2017.
Not what you would expect a
so-called democratic head of state to be doing, when he was
declaring his oath of office after an election. But then again,
Trudeau is not really the head of state.
He's a member of the Privy
Council office, which you have to be if you're going to be in a
cabinet position, in government or in the opposition.
The actual head of state
is the Governor General,
gentleman standing next to him
who is the appointee carrying out
the emanation of the powers
authority of The Crown
to give royal assent
to any law that becomes
law in Canada.
The Right Honorable David Johnston
You have Lieutenant Governors, a position in every single province.
You have a Privy Council office.
You have this whole weird Byzantine
structure above the apparent public aspect of our so-called
democracy in this monarchy of the north, which is, again, very
confusing for a lot of people.
What is this anomalous thing and what
is it a part of internationally? How did it come into being?
is, after all, a part of the British Commonwealth. This is something
that was set up in the late 1930s in preparation of the
transformation of the British Empire's outward image.
are about 54 countries in the British Commonwealth, with the center
being the United Kingdom.
The head of it is the
Queen of England.
It occupies about
12.2 million square miles of territory,
2.4 billion people are represented
within territories here,
the world's land area.
And people celebrate this
as if it's somehow a
These territories are,
the Caribbean, a few Latin American areas, a
lot of Africa (19 African nations in sub-Saharan Africa), eight
Asian nations, India being the biggest, Canada, Australia, New
Zealand, obviously, the
Five Eyes minus the United States.
Let's compare this to the old British Empire from 1920. It looks
People think the British Empire disappeared after World War II, that
it let its territories go free, and that now, the Empire is the big,
bad American Empire.
That's the mythology that's been passed down to
The real power that controlled the fifth column inside of the
United States, which has always been there since 1776, has always
been in London.
It never disappeared...
No empire of this sort ever just willfully gives liberty.
something you fight for.
There is a 2016 report called
The New Colonialism by a non-profit
that conducted audits on the British interest.
"101 companies listed
on the London Stock Exchange - most of them British - have
mining operations in 37 sub-Saharan African countries.
control over $1 trillion worth of Africa's most valuable
resources. The UK government has used its power and influence to
ensure that British mining companies have access to Africa's raw
This was the case
during the colonial period, and it is still the case today."
There is a strange organization called
The Crown Agent which is
affiliated with the
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as well as the
It was set up in 1833 as an emanation of The Crown. It's
not part of the government. It doesn't come from the consent of the
government. It comes from the singular sovereign, The Crown, as a
It was set up as a branch of the British Colonial Office to manage
infrastructure - hard and soft - of the colonies internationally of
Crown Agents has been managing the health
infrastructure, including Covid protocols of Eastern Europe,
especially in Ukraine. It manages many African countries, South
Sudan, Myanmar. And it deals with governance.
It helps these
countries adapt their governing mechanisms according to World Bank
and IMF standards. That's one aspect in terms of the maintenance of
the shadow Empire.
Now, one thing about this Commonwealth/City of London managed
system is that the Cayman Islands and offshore banking is the center
Internationally, you have 24% of the financial services
moving through a lot of British controlled Cayman Islands,
Caribbean, and other offshore tax havens.
But also, within these
the center of global drug money laundering
and terrorist financing.
People think drugs are
a natural plague of our society,
just a natural thing that happens.
No, this is very artificial.
These are created diseases
geopolitical in nature,
they are not religious in nature.
They are cultivated from the top.
This is a U.S. Senate report conducted over a long period, by
recently diseased senator Carl Levin on U.S. vulnerabilities to
money laundering, drugs, and terrorist financing:
the HSBC case...
It was discovered that HSBC was the number one offshore account
money laundering bank in the world.
It was set up in 1865 to enforce or manage the opium trade, to
HSBC was found guilty and slapped on the wrist with a
certain fine of $1.9 billion.
They were allowed to appoint their own
auditor to sit there for five years.
And they're still doing what
They have a huge stake in Air Canada.
Anybody who takes a
plane to Canada will see HSBC signs everywhere.
That is a huge piece
of infrastructure as part of the silver triangle that's been
underway for the whole of the 20th century.
You have the picture of the Queen
That's the Queen's
personal bank, which was also in 2012 found guilty of drug money
It paid its own little $10 million fine, and the bad
publicity results in the bank's offshore accounts that were
conducting the laundering to be sold off to the Royal Bank of
Canada, which currently conducts the same operations.
Africa, as well as $177 billion of debt holding it hostage,
meanwhile about $944 billion of revenue from the extraction of
wealth, sits in British offshore accounts.
So, it is not a debtor,
but predator nation en masse...
The City of London
Even the UK government
can't really do much legally
to stop it.
their own courts,
their own police.
I didn't even talk about dodgy dossiers being justified and created
by British intelligence that justified the bombing of
I didn't talk about the
Syrian dodgy dossiers of chemical
weapons that were never actually proven to be used by Assad, but
that had been justified for sanctions and justifying the regime
change that has been attempted now for seven years.
But all I have
to say is that the British hand is everywhere.
Even in the course of
the dodgy dossiers to try to put Putin as the big bad guy
controlling Trump. And also, the question of Rhodes Scholars, people
like Strobe Talbott, came in with Clinton and has been running
Brookings for a very long time.
This also has been behind
Gate with many other Rhodes Scholars currently managing the
administration, like Jake Sullivan, Susan Rice, Eric Lander.
Sciences are Rhodes Scholars.
They're just everywhere...
CITY OF LONDON
Unlike the United States Constitution or Declaration, Canada was
founded in 1867.
The original conference with our Founding Fathers
was not something that was a part of a fight for freedom, unlike the
These were all British loyalists, anti-republicans, like our
Founding Father Johnny McDonald.
He was an Aryan complete race
Patriot, wanting an Aryan Canada who said:
British I was born, and
British I will die...
He was a filthy, immoral scumbag.
And these are
the people celebrated as our sacred cows that we're supposed to
honor in Canada.
The Canadian founding document says literally:
Provinces of Canada have expressed their Desire to be federally
united in One Dominion under the Crown of the United Kingdom and
of Great Britain and Ireland, with a constitution similar in
Principle to that of the United Kingdom.
[Which is itself a
bit of a fraud since the UK doesn't really have a constitution,
so it's sort of a mirroring of a shadow.]
And whereas such a
Union would conduce to the Welfare of the Provinces and promote
the interests of the British Empire."
Canada was created
promote the interests
of the British Empire.
The point that the British were afraid of, was that Canada had
pro-linking statesmen in positions of leadership who were fighting
to create an independent country at that time.
So, this was seen as
a vital territory that had to be kept under the control of the
British Foreign Office. Lincoln's allies were ousted from power, and
it was kept as a wedge between the danger of a US-Russia
Wilford Laurier writes to his close ally O.D. Skelton that:
is now governed by a junta sitting in London, known as "The Round
Table", with ramifications in Toronto, in Winnipeg, in
Victoria with Tories [that's Conservatives] and Grits [that's
Liberals] receiving their ideas from London and insidiously
forcing them on their respective parties."
One of the problems was that they needed the power of the United
States behind them, and that's always been the objective of the
Cecil Rhodes design.
Lord Lothian, who was a leading
Round Tabler at
the time - he was the ambassador to the United States - had written
about the problem of the American psyche that had to be dealt with:
"There is a
fundamentally different concept in regard to the question
between Great Britain and the United States as to the necessity
of civilized control over politically backward peoples...
The inhabitants of
Africa and parts of Asia have proved unable to govern
Yet America not only
has no conception of this aspect of the problem but has been led
to believe that the assumption of this kind of responsibility is
Americans don't get that
there's a white man's burden
that they have to impose
- because they
are scientifically better
than the darker skinned people -
over the backward peoples.
They just don't
That was a problem...
There were several attempts at new world orders.
What we're seeing
today is not a new thing.
In 1919 you had the creation of
House, you have the creation of the Versailles, the League of
Nations, all orchestrated by Lord Milner who at this time was a
leading figure controlling British foreign policy along with many
other Round Tablers.
The idea of the League of Nations
was to read a collective security
pact, Article 10,
get rid of national sovereignty
over economics and military affairs
and create effectively a one world government.
This was also part of the Imperial Federation, kind of like what the
European Union wants for the world.
Why did it fail?
in Canada resisted, the lorry Liberals resisted, Irish Free State
movements resisted, and people like Warren Harding (who was
You had nationalists who resisted and didn't
succumb to this pressure at the time...
They tried again...
In 1933 there was the International Bankers
Conference in London centered around the
Bank of International
Settlements, the Bank of England.
Sixty-six nations had been a part
of it, all with the desire that the Great Depression would be solved
by moving sovereignty economically from nation states into
officially essential bankers' codery under the Bank of England.
the only reason for the failure after six months was that Franklin
Roosevelt pulled the US delegations out of all participation.
just fell apart...
Then there was another attempt in 1944.
John Maynard Keynes was
assigned this time to represent the British Empire at the Bretton
Woods Conference with the idea of a one world currency run by the
Bank of England called "the Bancor,"
an international exchange rate
that would be again effectively a one world currency, with the idea
of the Americans who had come
out of World War II as the only unbroken country to be the battering
ram or the enforcers of an Anglo-American reconquering of the
nations of the world.
Many of these nations had fought during the
war, and many had ideas of independence and freedom alive in their
hearts. That was not acceptable.
There is a sharp quote from Franklin Roosevelt, that I want to
"They who seek to
establish systems of government based on the regimentation of
all human beings by a handful of individual rulers call this a
It is not new, and it
is not order."
There's a book called As
He Saw It, written in 1946 by Roosevelt's son and his personal
assistant Elliot Roosevelt.
He documents a lot of the battles
between Roosevelt versus the Churchill gang that were trying to
always pull the US into a Brotherhood of Control - ŕ la Cecil
Rhodes, right, ŕ la Five Eyes - which is already what was creeping
up and happening from the Black Chamber being transformed into the NSA in 1930, which became integrated more and more into the
Five Eyes thing.
But there were still a lot of Patriots and nationalists embedded in
American intelligence within the OSS who were problematic for those
trying to take control, who had pretty much occupied most of the
State Department by this time.
many great Patriots of the United States
either died or
their careers annihilated.
Enrico Mattei, the Italian industrialist.
Hammarskjöld, the Secretary General of the UN, who had a grand
program to end imperialism and promote industrial development in a
variety of countries, especially in South Africa.
Charles de Gaulle
had avoided 30 assassination attempts.
John F. Kennedy, Patrice
I didn't put everybody on here who was either assassinated
or overthrown in CIA-MI6-directed coups.
That's why JFK offered the
Russians the ability to work with the United States on a joint space
So, that would be something to break away, to
liberate us from this mathematical balance of terror way of
After the age of assassinations,
the focus has always been
of the United States.
Kissinger is a key figure in much of this.
You have the creation in
January 1971 of the Inter-Alpha Group created under the blueprint of
The Inter-Alpha Group of banks set up in each
of the focused European countries to advance a new doctrine of
deregulation, centralizing power away from nation states, especially
in Europe, and moving it into the private supranational coterie of
corporate and financial interests above national authorities.
Many of these banks
all tied to financial activities
supporting fascism's rise,
Franco, Mussolini or Hitler.
Then the same month,
the World Economic Forum is founded by one of
One of the co-founders was
Maurice Strong, a Canadian oligarch who was picked up by
Rockefellers and who also was a co-founder of the Canadian
Another co-founder was Prince
Philip, who is the guy who's
called for being reincarnated as a deadly virus.
On August 15, 1971, Kissinger and Schultz running the Nixon
administration orchestrate the removal of the dollar from the gold
Without speculation, it was difficult to conduct the sorts
of economic warfare against nations trying to develop their
infrastructure and their industrial base, which has always been,
even going back to the 19th century, a tool used by the Empire to
keep nations destabilized.
So, the fixed exchange rate had to go.
guaranteed too much stability.
They created chaos...
Under Carter, the
Trilateral Commission takes over.
member of Carter's cabinet is a member of the Trilateral Commission.
People like Paul Volcker, who becomes
the FED chair, calls for a
controlled disintegration of the US economy in 1979, which is where
the interest rates are raised to 20% or more for two years,
destroying small and medium-sized businesses and only leading these
behemoth multinational companies able to survive and thrive and
gobble up under mergers and acquisitions.
how he preferred
the Churchill way of thinking
over the Roosevelt idea.
Total admission. They just admit it.
They just assume that
we're too dumb to put
words and actions
Lord Jacob Rothschild delivered a speech in 1983 where he referred
to the breakdown of the division of bank activities from commercial,
investment, trust, insurance.
All of these had formerly, under
Roosevelt, been designed in separate compartments so you couldn't
speculate with people's savings.
George Bush says in 1990 at the opening of the Kuwait War:
"We have before us
the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future
generations a new world order –
when we are successful - and we will be - we have a real chance
at this new world order."
The separation of US
commercial banking from speculation is broken down by Clinton,
Rhodes Scholar, last act in office.
And then from that point forward
you have the ushering in of just the biggest cancer of derivatives,
going from 2 trillion in 1992 to 70 trillion in 1999, by that point,
overlapping the US global GDP.
All too big to fail, or so they want
us to believe, so we have to bail them out. And by 2007, when the
next collapse hits, there's $708 trillion of derivatives weighing
down the system, far outweighing the $15 trillion of the US GDP.
A real economy only works if you have the financial side always
servicing and improving upon the real side - manufacturing,
infrastructure, science. And that's why the bubble that was created
today was a planned disintegration and it was always designed for
1971 to disintegrate.
The question is when would be the pinprick?
The pinprick has
Thank you, Matthew. Let me just verify that I understand you
correctly. The main point is that the British Empire has never
ceased to exist.
It is still there.
Colonialism is still existing, except its existing under a
different name. It has never stopped to try and pull the United States
back in, but for some reason, it hasn't really been successful.
that part in the country
that tries to
the United States into
the Anglo-American system
into, the City of London,
Matthew Ehret: I have no problem with what you just said.
Reiner Fuellmich: One final question.
The power of the City of
London combined with its fifth column, Wall Street. Is it really
Did I understand correctly that all that money, all that
power was capable of starting World War I and World War II, with
these financial behemoths financing both sides?
Matthew Ehret: Oh, yeah, absolutely.
Reiner Fuellmich: Okay.
I just wanted to make sure that I didn't
misunderstand you. And finally, anyone who can start two world
wars probably has no problem to create diseases like terrorism
and drug trade.
So that, in essence, was started by this
financial behemoth City of London, plus Wall Street.
Matthew Ehret: Yeah.
And I would just add one quick thing on
that, which is that the British - I conducted an interview with
Alex Krainer based on a wonderful trilogy he wrote on the
original British design for a New World Order under people like
Lord Halifax, the appeasers of Britain who were people like
Neville Chamberlain, who were part of an operation which all the
way up until 1939-1940 still wanted to have an Anglo-American
fascist alliance with Hitler and Mussolini and others,
the world as a new world order and be enforcers of a eugenics
policy of population control under a scientifically managed
society from the top.
That was a design all the way up until the
ouster of Neville Chamberlain.
Hitler had become a Frankenstein
monster that was no longer behaving according to its commands
and had bigger ambitions to be at the head of the helm instead
of a secondary enforcer for the will of a banking class.
they had to change strategy and abort that plan.
oligarchy screwed up a lot.
They're not as powerful
as they want us
to believe they are,
which is an intimidation of the mind.
time you look at what they're trying
- the thing that they're trying
to do today is not new -
they've tried many times,
and usually, it
blows up in their face
and undermines them.
Then they have to
and try something new.
Reiner Fuellmich: I do understand now that Vera Sharav, a Holocaust
survivor, says that she can't believe that she's fighting the same
people, the same structures again that she fought 75 years ago,
because it looks as though what happened then is happening again.
Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt: Thanks so much for your evidence.
mentioned right at the onset of the statement of evidence that
you've given, you're talking about natural law. As we all know, the
substantive law that we are using in this grand jury is natural law.
So, I would like to find out from you, based on all the research
that you've done, how important is natural law for humanity
survival? And most importantly, how is it related to constitutional
Matthew Ehret: Dexter, that's an amazing question.
That's a very
good question. In my understanding, all of world history has been
shaped by a battle between either artificial law - I mean, mankind
is the only species that we know of that creates and improves upon
the laws of the systems that we self-organize around.
ordained by their genetics, by their environment and their wiring to
be what they are, and that's great.
But human beings are uniquely
able to craft conceptions and apply those conceptions to manage our
own existence. And then identify problems with the so-called
invisible metaphysical machine of statecraft and improve upon them.
But upon what standard do we improve upon?
Upon what standard do we
judge our man-made laws to say,
"Okay, this one squares with
something that is designed by God",
...and which ones are out of whack,
out of harmony, that we have to correct, that are illegitimate or,
as Thomas Cleas would say, forms of violence.
If a law can
actually deprive you
of your innate ability
to express your
life, liberty, happiness, creative powers,
what a law is doing,
it's not a
it's a form of violence.
It does not have to be respected.
The Founding Fathers were very sensitive to the fact that there is a
It's not even separate from scientific law. That's why
Benjamin Franklin was also a scientist who discovered principles of
electricity that he shared.
But in his mind, his discoveries of the
laws of electricity were not separated from the metaphysical moral
laws that became the foundation of his life's effort to create a
republic of self-governance, premises on the inalienable rights of
the individual and not the hereditary institutions that had governed
society for thousands of years.
That was the first time it was done.
Again, in his world, it was two sides of the same thing. Real
science is not mathematical description or trying to impose a
formula onto the universe and expect the universe to abide by it.
It's about tuning our own creative reason in harmony with that
universe that is always going to be more discoverable.
time we transmit those new eurekas in any domain to our fellow
mankind and then apply it to the productive process, the universe
responds by giving us greater standards of living, right?
sustain more people at a higher standard of life than we could have
if we didn't have electricity, if we didn't have knowledge of fire,
where we were living like cattle in caves.
If we abide by those certain principles, as Benjamin Franklin and
others understood, we will have greater emancipation.
The Empire, the oligarchical system of a hereditary elite, will lose
its places to put its claws, like a parasite that it is, into the
It won't have much to grab onto and it will lose its power and
it will self-implode, as we're seeing right now.
Alex Thomson: What we are now seeing in the jurisdictions of the
United Kingdom, the court systems in all of these realms, which are
basically common law, are starting to arrogate to themselves, at
judicial level, the power to decide mens rea.
They are further ahead
than any common law or civil law jurisdiction in our repeated
findings now in asserting that even if there is a jury there for
show - and they seem to be trying to get rid of them now under the
spurious claim that international treaty requirements require them
to dwindle the use of juries - they reserve the right to determine
what was in the mind of the perpetrator.
And very often now, it's a
drafting which comes from the tax exempt foundations, such as the
Carnegie Foundation that I spoke about earlier, via the House of
Commons library telling the legislators in Britain, which then will
lead other countries in the same way, that there is an ersatz
version of the public good or the public welfare now which is called
collective well-being, collective welfare.
That's what the
foundations were doing all through the 20th century, creating
enemies for that very purpose. And now the courts are saying if you
have offended against society, then there is no redress, you are
And that is the furthest towards getting rid of natural law
that I've seen anywhere.
It has gone further than any European
totalitarian state, any international court.
It's now coming
that the British national level through legislation,
ultimately from the think-tanks,
the abolition of the concept that
whether you're guilty or not.
Reiner Fuellmich: Is it possible that, not only in Europe but also
in the United States, there is a movement that, having understood
what is going on, is trying to distance themselves?
about the United States trying to distance themselves from the
Europeans and in particular from the City of London, because "we are
simply buried under debt, and we carry too much dead weight with
I'm saying this in layman's terms. What do you think, Alex and
Alex Thomson: For my part, absolutely.
And the recent testimony I
gave to you, I spoke about that, that...
...there is a large
belt of heartland America that has woken up to this and now sees
what they regard as an Anglo or an Anglo-European problem
And I think that they are
getting heartily sick of it all, because of the amount of treason
Just as codicil to Matt's testimony about 1971 when the financial
coup was pulled off.
One of the indications that the Americans were
being used as hapless pawns in this is that that very year,
Kissinger is said to have told the military, by which he largely
meant the US military, were brute, dumb beasts, sent to do other
And in that same year, being the new Secretary of State
under the incoming Nixon administration, he got a
Massachusetts-based manufacturer, the only manufacturer in the world
that could produce precision ball bearings - Bryant Chucking Grinder
- to supply the ball bearings to the Soviet Union to allow them to
develop multiple independent re-entry vehicle warheads.
I know that
well one from James Bush, one of our extra testimonials this
evening; who was personally involved in the American side of that.
treason involved is such that
where the United States had even
a military or an economic lead,
cabal we're talking about
deliberately abolished that.
Matthew Ehret: There are
fifth columns in Russia, and every country
has its own
They've got their own battles between
legitimate forces who represent these cultures versus these other
I would say in Eurasia, you actually have
had more serious pushback in a serious way to the point that there
is a genuine alternative strategy that has been deployed outside of
the framework of the cage of NATO that is imploding, and it was
always designed to implode.
And I think you've got forces within the
United States - I see it more currently on the state level - that
don't want to go down with the sinking ship.
There are forces all
Unfortunately, the federal executive branches of most
of the transatlantic governments have been in large measure captured
not entirely always but in a depressing level.
So, I'm not an expert
in geopolitical planning, and I do hope that the creative forces are
able to utilize the self-contradictions and insanity of the Empire
to their benefit, since again, this Empire, once it succeeds, it can
only destroy itself as well.
I do see that there are
that want to have a future,
that want to survive,
are organically organizing.
I just think they need
to sharpen up their game plan
of what they
the world to be.
Because a lot of people still think, especially in America, and a
lot of the Patriots who don't like
The Great Reset, they tend to
have fallen for certain traps that have given them a narrative, that
- it's the Cold War narrative:
the real enemy behind everything is
not the British Empire...
It's not the oligarchy, it's not that...
the Chinese communists that want to destroy your freedoms, that's
who's behind everything...
And a lot of people fall into that, and I
think that to the degree that they hold onto those Cold War
narratives, they're going to self-sabotage their overarching desires
to have a successful battle against this oligarchical thing...